 over){kind=link}
The political stage in Kano has once again turned into a theatre of intrigue, as fresh controversy rocks the All Progressives Congress (APC) over the reported denial of a re-election ticket to Alhassan Ado Doguwa.
In what many observers describe as a dramatic twist, party insiders allege that the ticket has instead been handed to a figure linked to the inner circle of power—reportedly the husband of Sa’adatu Doguwa, Chairperson of Kano State Chairmen—triggering a wave of criticism and disbelief among party faithful.
For analysts, the unfolding episode underscores a deeper pattern within internal party politics, where influence, proximity to power, and elite networks often overshadow merit, grassroots support, and long-standing loyalty.
“This is no longer conventional politics—it’s becoming a scripted drama,” a political commentator in Kano remarked. “The perception being created is that tickets are negotiated behind closed doors, not earned in the open field.”
The development has reignited debate about internal democracy within the ruling party, particularly in Kano, where factional tensions and power struggles have repeatedly shaped political outcomes. Critics argue that such decisions risk eroding public trust and weakening the party’s credibility ahead of future elections.
At the heart of the controversy is the growing sentiment that loyalty within the APC has become increasingly fragile. For many party members, Doguwa’s reported exclusion—despite his long-standing presence and influence—signals that political relevance can shift abruptly, often without transparent justification.
Supporters of the move, however, are said to view it as part of broader strategic realignments within the party, aimed at consolidating control and reshaping political structures at both state and national levels.
Yet, for neutral observers, the optics remain troubling. The idea that a ticket could remain within a close-knit circle fuels narratives of favoritism and “family politics,” raising questions about fairness, inclusiveness, and the future of internal party cohesion.
Kano, a key political battleground, has long been central to the APC’s electoral calculations. As such, internal disputes of this magnitude carry implications far beyond the state, potentially affecting voter confidence and party unity on a larger scale.
While official clarification from party leadership is still awaited, the controversy has already sparked intense discussions across political circles, with many watching closely to see whether the situation will escalate into a broader intra-party crisis.
For now, the episode adds yet another chapter to Kano APC’s turbulent political story—one that continues to blur the line between strategy and spectacle, and leaves many questioning whether internal democracy is truly being upheld or quietly rewritten behind the scenes.
About The Author
