By: Babagana Bukar Wakil, Maiduguri
On June 12 each year, Nigeria pauses to reflect on the resilience of its democracy a milestone deeply tied to the country’s political metamorphosis and its unique journey from military dictatorship to democratic rule. Yet, often overlooked in this commemoration is the pivotal, if paradoxical, role of the Nigerian Armed Forces in not just relinquishing political power but in steadfastly defending the democratic order over the last 25 years.
The decision of former President Muhammadu Buhari to designate June 12 as Nigeria’s Democracy Day was more than symbolic. It was a rectification of historical injustice, but also a recognition of the political maturity the country has achieved alot in no small part to the military institution’s post-1999 realignment as guardians, not usurpers, of democratic governance.
The history of Nigeria’s post-colonial statecraft is deeply intertwined with the military. From the first coup of January 1966 to the final military-led administration under General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the Nigerian military had often been the arbiter of political change frequently to the detriment of democratic institutions. However, the transition of 1999 marked a watershed moment, not only for the political class but for the Armed Forces as an institution.
That handover, unlike others before it, was not merely a tactical withdrawal. It represented a strategic redefinition of the military’s place in Nigeria’s constitutional order—a repositioning from ruler to protector.
Since 1999, the Armed Forces of Nigeria have abided by a doctrine of civilian supremacy, enshrined in Section 217 of the 1999 Constitution, which positions them under the command of a democratically elected President. This constitutional alignment has had profound implications: it has institutionalized the military’s loyalty to democratic rule and constrained its role to territorial defense, internal security, and international peacekeeping—eschewing political interference.
This professional realignment was neither automatic nor accidental. It required an intentional process of civil-military relations reform, command restructuring, and the internalization of democratic ethos among the officer corps. Today’s Armed Forces reflect a new generation of military leadership trained in democratic norms, rule of law, and strategic non-partisanship.
Over the last two and a half decades, the Nigerian military has increasingly played a supportive role in Nigeria’s electoral processes providing logistical security in volatile regions, aiding the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and defending citizens’ rights to vote in peaceful conditions. While critics have at times raised concerns about militarization of elections, institutional reforms and clearer rules of engagement have reinforced the military’s nonpartisan role.
The armed forces have largely refrained from partisan activity or political pronouncements, maintaining operational neutrality an achievement that stands in sharp contrast to the military politics of the 1960s through the 1990s.
Post-1999 Nigeria has witnessed the gradual civilianization of defense policymaking, including parliamentary oversight of defense budgets, procurement processes, and national security strategies. These reforms have helped foster a healthy civil-military balance and instill greater accountability, ensuring that the military remains subject to democratic scrutiny without compromising its operational effectiveness.
From the creation of the Ministry of Defence’s Civil-Military Cooperation Directorate to the increased collaboration with civil society on human rights education and humanitarian operations, the Armed Forces have demonstrated a new-found institutional confidence in democratic norms.
Nigeria’s contemporary security environment from the Boko Haram insurgency in the North East to banditry in the North West and secessionist agitations in the South East has demanded an extraordinary level of military deployment. Despite such broad engagement in internal affairs, the military has not exploited these crises for political leverage.
This restraint is not merely a product of institutional discipline it also stems from evolving civil-military sociology. Today’s officer corps are shaped by international peacekeeping exposure, academic training in political science, and a professional ethos rooted in constitutionalism rather than conquest.
Modern military doctrine in Nigeria emphasizes the ‘Doctrine of Non-Interference in Civil Governance’. This principle rooted in international norms and internal codes of conduct has been internalized across the Nigerian Army, Navy, and Air Force. Officers are trained to see themselves as instruments of state policy, not competitors for power.
This doctrine has served as a bulwark against the kinds of military adventurism that marred Nigeria’s political trajectory in previous decades.
June 12 is no longer simply a day to remember the annulment of the 1993 elections. It is now a celebration of the resilience of Nigeria’s political institutions and the collective contributions of all national stakeholders including the military to democratic consolidation.
As Nigeria marks 25 years of uninterrupted democratic governance, the role of the military as a non-partisan, constitutionally loyal institution deserves both recognition and continued reinforcement.
In a region plagued by recent military takeovers from Mali to Burkina Faso and Niger—Nigeria’s military restraint and loyalty to constitutional governance shine as a model of democratic civil-military relations. The country’s armed forces, guided by a new generation of professional leadership, have helped keep Nigeria on a democratic trajectory despite enormous internal security challenges.
The imperative now is to sustain this momentum through continued reforms, civic education within the military, and further integration of defense policy into Nigeria’s democratic framework.
Democracy in Nigeria remains a work in progress. It is fraught with institutional fragilities, electoral imperfections, and sociopolitical volatility. But amidst these challenges, one truth remains unassailable: the Nigerian military has, for 25 years, honored its constitutional duty as a protector not a predator of democracy.
In honoring June 12, Nigerians must also honor the men and women in uniform who, through their professionalism and restraint, have helped safeguard the most fundamental ideal of the republic: the right of the people to choose their leaders, peacefully and freely
This restraint is not merely a product of institutional discipline it also stems from evolving civil-military sociology. Today’s officer corps are shaped by international peacekeeping exposure, academic training in political science, and a professional ethos rooted in constitutionalism rather than conquest.
Modern military doctrine in Nigeria emphasizes the ‘Doctrine of Non-Interference in Civil Governance’. This principle rooted in international norms and internal codes of conduct has been internalized across the Nigerian Army, Navy, and Air Force. Officers are trained to see themselves as instruments of state policy, not competitors for power.
This doctrine has served as a bulwark against the kinds of military adventurism that marred Nigeria’s political trajectory in previous decades.
June 12 is no longer simply a day to remember the annulment of the 1993 elections. It is now a celebration of the resilience of Nigeria’s political institutions and the collective contributions of all national stakeholders—including the military—to democratic consolidation.
As Nigeria marks 25 years of uninterrupted democratic governance, the role of the military as a non-partisan, constitutionally loyal institution deserves both recognition and continued reinforcement.
In a region plagued by recent military takeovers—from Mali to Burkina Faso and Niger—Nigeria’s military restraint and loyalty to constitutional governance shine as a model of democratic civil-military relations. The country’s armed forces, guided by a new generation of professional leadership, have helped keep Nigeria on a democratic trajectory despite enormous internal security challenges.
The imperative now is to sustain this momentum through continued reforms, civic education within the military, and further integration of defense policy into Nigeria’s democratic framework.
Democracy and democratization with American in Nigeria remains a work in progress. It is fraught with institutional fragilities, electoral imperfections, and sociopolitical volatility. But amidst these challenges, one truth remains unassailable: the Nigerian military has, for 25 years, honored its constitutional duty as a protector not a predator of democracy.
In honoring June 12, Nigerians must also honor the men and women in uniform who, through their professionalism and restraint, have helped safeguard the most fundamental ideal of the republic: the right of the people to choose their leaders, peacefully and freely.
End
About The Author
