In a case that’s already sending shockwaves through Nigeria’s political and legal circles, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan appeared before the Federal High Court in Abuja today, facing six serious counts of cybercrime — including explosive allegations of defamation and incitement.
The charges, filed by the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, stem from public statements made by the senator during a televised interview and public speech, where she accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello of plotting to assassinate her.
The Federal Government alleges that her statements, broadcast via electronic means, were not only false and injurious but also capable of inciting public unrest and endangering lives — a direct violation of the newly amended Cybercrimes Act of 2024.
Standing tall in court, Senator Natasha pleaded not guilty to all charges. Her legal team, led by a prominent human rights lawyer, argued for bail on the grounds that she is a public servant with no criminal history and poses no flight risk.
Justice Mohammed Umar agreed, granting her bail on self-recognition while cautioning all parties involved against media trial or interference with the judicial process.
The prosecution, while not objecting to the bail request, urged the court to ensure the senator’s presence throughout the trial to prevent any delays. The case was adjourned to September 22, 2025, for full trial proceedings to commence.
The fiery lawmaker, known for her bold stance on governance and corruption, has described the charges as politically motivated, hinting at a larger power play within the corridors of power.
Legal analysts say the case may serve as a litmus test for how Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act will be interpreted and enforced going forward — especially in a political climate rife with allegations, counter-allegations, and the rising influence of digital media.
As tensions rise and eyes stay glued to the courtroom, one thing is clear: Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal battle is just beginning — and it could reshape the boundaries of free speech and political accountability in Nigeria.
About The Author
